 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Title: |
Paced Glottic Closure for Controlling Aspiration Pneumonia in Patients With Neurologic Deficits of Various Causes | ||||||||||||||||||
| Authors: | Michael Broniatowski, MD; Nina Z. Moore, MS, JMS; Sharon Grundfest-Broniatowski, MD; Harvey M. Tucker, MD; Ellen Lancaster, MA; Kate Krival, PhD; Aaron J. Hadley; Dustin J. Tyler, PhD | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Objectives: We undertook to determine whether paced vocal fold adduction can check aspiration in patients with various
neurologic conditions.
Methods: Five patients with fluoroscopically documented aspiration and repeated pneumonias were enrolled. Two previously reported patients with hemispheric stroke were compared to 3 additional subjects with brain stem–basal ganglia and cerebellar stroke, cerebral palsy, and multiple sclerosis. A modified Vocare stimulator was implanted subcutaneously and linked to the ipsilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve via perineural electrodes. Vocal fold adduction and glottic closure were effected with pulse trains (42 Hz; 1.2 mA; 188 to 560 μs) and recorded with Enhanced Image J. Fluoroscopy results with and without stimulation were assessed by 2 independent blinded reviewers. Pneumonia rates were compared before, during, and after the 6- to 12-month enrollment periods. Results: There was statistically significant vocal fold adduction (p < 0.05) for all patients, further verified with bolus arrest (p < 0.05 for thin liquids, thick liquids, and puree depending on the speech-language pathologist). Pneumonia was prevented in 4 of the 5 patients during enrollment. In the fifth patient, who had brain stem–basal ganglia and cerebellar stroke, we were unable to completely seal the glottis and open the cricopharyngeus enough to handle his secretions. Conclusions: Vocal fold pacing for aspiration pneumonia from a variety of neurologic insults appears to be appropriate as long as the glottis can be sealed. It is not sufficient when the cricopharyngeus must be independently opened. (Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2010;119:141-149.) |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Acrobat Reader 8.0 is recommeded to properly view and print the article.
Reader can be downloaded here:  |
|||||||||||||||||||
